Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1190

reference
58-tree-1
name
1190
tree-preservation-order

undefined

58-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.979452 50.792480)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.979395 50.792474,-0.979398 50.792485,-0.979406 50.792495,-0.979418 50.792503,-0.979434 50.792508,-0.979451 50.792510,-0.979469 50.792509,-0.979485 50.792504,-0.979497 50.792496,-0.979506 50.792486,-0.979509 50.792475,-0.979506 50.792464,-0.979498 50.792453,-0.979486 50.792445,-0.979470 50.792440,-0.979453 50.792438,-0.979435 50.792440,-0.979419 50.792445,-0.979407 50.792453,-0.979398 50.792463,-0.979395 50.792474)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL